what is the best systems management tool
Answers (24)
Dell KACE K1000, of course. Empirum from Matrix42!
Comments:
-
I have had success in the past with MS SMS (now called SCCM) moving to SCCM 2012 in May
Really like the software metering - Saint.troy 12 years ago-
Agree! Though I do not have experience with KACE, but I do have with both LANDesk and SCCM. I believe SCCM wins the battle, no doubt. Maybe LANDesk is sometimes cheaper, but that depends on your environment. Take a look at http://www.itexperience.net/2013/03/06/sccm-2012-vs-landesk-9-0-sp3-the-other-story-2/ for a comparison from the administrator's view. - MichaelScott 11 years ago
Comments:
-
I agree on the huge environments, but want to add that the infrastructure complexity should keep to minimum. - dedenker 9 years ago
Honestly ZCM is WAAAAAAY better as a software deployment tool. It is insanely powerful and surprisingly simple and easy to use, very user friendly.
SCCM is extremely complex, at least 3-4 objects to deploy 1 simple piece of software vs ZCM's 1. SCCM does have beer bandwidth management with MS bits technology though. ZCM's main drawback is bandwidth management... there really isn't any (as of 10.x), except for satellite servers (these are very nice and powerful though) which does not help outside of the local network.
Comments:
-
Nice to see that ZCM still has ground!
I just had the idea that ZCM is also strong with large infrastructures, the down site is the price of the product. - dedenker 9 years ago
Comments:
-
I agree! - subSYStem 12 years ago
-
I am an Empirum user from 2005! Windows 7 rollout is quick and easy, easier then SCCM which I also have experiences. It's a German product from Matrix42 which is flexible and easy to manage. We now manage 600 Client over 6 locations with Subdepot servers to unburden the WAN connections. - doni 12 years ago
Comments:
-
Also, has around 7k clients on it and maybe are going to pass 10k this year. - Erroneus 12 years ago
KACE is by far the easiest to setup, however I believe it lacks in the criteria for creating groups/smart groups. SCCM offers much more criteria which is necessary in our environment.
SCCM is very good i prefer it the most very easy to setup Windows updates and create third party packages. Microsoft has really stepped up in SCCM 2012 i've been testing that and love it.
I prefer Absolute manage for deploying updates and packages to MAC's
I manage a network of around 175 computers & servers and have used the KBOX 1000 for the last few years. I feel it is the best product by far for small & medium sized companies.
I looked into other products, but they were all either more expensive, way harder to use, or missing required features. I wanted 1 product to handle inventory, software distribution, and patching.
Comments:
-
I personally feel for medium business, ZCM is an AWESOME tool. I moved from a ZCM to SCCM shop and constantly am frustrated with the deployment limitations of SCCM.
Also the largest failure rates are always caused by the SCCM client itself, ZCM we never had nearly as many client issues during each deployment. - dandirk 12 years ago
The questions you have to ask yourself is what you know and how much change is worth the money/effort for the company.
I know Zenworks, they had Altiris.
Now use SCCM, and the motivation was money.
In the end I really wonder if money was saved or lost, but nobody would never admit a lose of course.
My personal vote goes to Zenworks!
Doesn't anybody have a list of favorite functions ?
Lots of votes for the market leaders...
I have a lot of experience with LANDesk and SCCM 2007/2012, then Altiris, Marimba, Tivoli and Zenworks. Also a couple of bespoke tools written to mimic SCCM (ironically).
I like the simple reliability of LANDesk, it used to be a lot cheaper than SCCM. I don't really know why but a lot of my clients are going with SCCM, they are being 'sold it', but in reality, could probably do with a smaller simpler and cheaper tool. But Microsoft are doing some good deals so its not too bad price wise (but I'm glad I am not paying for it).
On a positive side for SCCM 2012, the client, yes is a bit crap, BUT, you can set baseline monitoring and get it heal itself now, using the baselines (desired config) could be a very useful tool to make sure things stay as you want them.
The best tool is one that does what you need for the price you are willing to pay. For larger firms, typically SCCM is chosen due to the number of management technologies, scalability and licensing agreements. SCCM does have slightly increased complexity over other solutions and it is notorious for a flakey WMI agent.
I had success in KACE with K1000 and K2000 in 5Country I thinks this software is best!! - manpang 10 years ago