/build/static/layout/Breadcrumb_cap_w.png

K1000 and K2000 SAMBA remote code execution vulnerability

According to a Nexpose scan, both our K1000 and K2000 show as vulnerable to the following SAMBA bulletin.
I have not seen anything from Quest regarding this.

https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2017-7494.html
====================================================================
== Subject:     Remote code execution from a writable share.
==
== CVE ID#:     CVE-2017-7494
==
== Versions:    All versions of Samba from 3.5.0 onwards.
==
== Summary:     Malicious clients can upload and cause the smbd server
==              to execute a shared library from a writable share.
==
====================================================================

===========
Description
===========

All versions of Samba from 3.5.0 onwards are vulnerable to a remote
code execution vulnerability, allowing a malicious client to upload a
shared library to a writable share, and then cause the server to load
and execute it.

==================
Patch Availability
==================

A patch addressing this defect has been posted to

  http://www.samba.org/samba/security/

Additionally, Samba 4.6.4, 4.5.10 and 4.4.14 have been issued as
security releases to correct the defect. Patches against older Samba
versions are available at http://samba.org/samba/patches/. Samba
vendors and administrators running affected versions are advised to
upgrade or apply the patch as soon as possible.

==========
Workaround
==========

Add the parameter:

nt pipe support = no

to the [global] section of your smb.conf and restart smbd. This
prevents clients from accessing any named pipe endpoints. Note this
can disable some expected functionality for Windows clients.

=======
Credits
=======

This problem was found by steelo <knownsteelo@gmail.com>. Volker
Lendecke of SerNet and the Samba Team provided the fix.


Comments

  • So, no one has heard anything from Quest about this yet? - cogx 7 years ago
  • well, Quest is working on it.
    But since this fix is not as easy as in the "blog" there is not yet a solution (this parameter breaks some major functions of a SMB server, for some systems this does not matter but for the majority it does)
    You may refer to these two articles:
    https://support.quest.com/kb/230044
    https://support.quest.com/kb/230047 - Nico_K 7 years ago
This post is locked

Don't be a Stranger!

Sign up today to participate, stay informed, earn points and establish a reputation for yourself!

Sign up! or login

Share

 
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site and/or clicking the "Accept" button you are providing consent Quest Software and its affiliates do NOT sell the Personal Data you provide to us either when you register on our websites or when you do business with us. For more information about our Privacy Policy and our data protection efforts, please visit GDPR-HQ