Citrix
HI all,
What changes are made when packaging msis for a Citrix server rather than a regular client desktop. Using installshield 5.x. Any suggestions appreciated.
What changes are made when packaging msis for a Citrix server rather than a regular client desktop. Using installshield 5.x. Any suggestions appreciated.
0 Comments
[ + ] Show comments
Answers (9)
Please log in to answer
Posted by:
VikingLoki
20 years ago
Posted by:
plangton
20 years ago
Hi Oreillyr, VikingLoki,
I think this actually depends on the server setup more so than the fact you are using citrix. Say for instance you have an app packaged for normal desktops and you want to put it on a citrix server. If, as is common in server setups, the C drive is quite lean then you'll need to install it to another drive. This might not require a new MSI/MST, but in some cases it does.
Also, some utilities (like RelfectionX) for example, have utilities that test things like graphics speed and capabilities on first launch. These should be disabled for Citrix server installations (relfectionx is good because their website details which to leave out in a thin server environment).
It does need to be looked at carefully, also from the front that its a different OS you are installing on (Windows 200 Server vs Windows 2000 desktop, or Windows 2003 Server vs XP desktops, or whatever the case may be).
Hope this helps
Rgds
Paul
I think this actually depends on the server setup more so than the fact you are using citrix. Say for instance you have an app packaged for normal desktops and you want to put it on a citrix server. If, as is common in server setups, the C drive is quite lean then you'll need to install it to another drive. This might not require a new MSI/MST, but in some cases it does.
Also, some utilities (like RelfectionX) for example, have utilities that test things like graphics speed and capabilities on first launch. These should be disabled for Citrix server installations (relfectionx is good because their website details which to leave out in a thin server environment).
It does need to be looked at carefully, also from the front that its a different OS you are installing on (Windows 200 Server vs Windows 2000 desktop, or Windows 2003 Server vs XP desktops, or whatever the case may be).
Hope this helps
Rgds
Paul
Posted by:
oofemioo
20 years ago
There isn't any major difference in the MSI you create.
However, I do prefer to use the Citrix Packager and create WSF when I intend deploying to Citrix Server. There is no major reason for my decision with the exception that I Citrix Packager is made by Citrix.
Are u deploying with Citrix Installation Manager or some other 3rd party deployment tools?
However, I do prefer to use the Citrix Packager and create WSF when I intend deploying to Citrix Server. There is no major reason for my decision with the exception that I Citrix Packager is made by Citrix.
Are u deploying with Citrix Installation Manager or some other 3rd party deployment tools?
Posted by:
oreillyr
20 years ago
Posted by:
Vision33r
20 years ago
Skip packaging, there are many ways to package Citrix, however pay attention to the ini files and registry because if you want a configured client, you need to make sure the configurations in the ini files are copied over.
Or you can create basic Citrix packages and publish *.ica files with all the configurations built in.
Or you can create basic Citrix packages and publish *.ica files with all the configurations built in.
Posted by:
MSIMaker
20 years ago
Posted by:
oofemioo
20 years ago
Posted by:
oreillyr
20 years ago
Posted by:
MSIMaker
20 years ago
Rating comments in this legacy AppDeploy message board thread won't reorder them,
so that the conversation will remain readable.
so that the conversation will remain readable.