Worse Vendor Supplied MSI
Vote on the worse Vendor suplied MSI that you have come across, reply and post any others.
0 Comments
[ + ] Show comments
Answers (21)
Please log in to answer
Posted by:
MSIMaker
20 years ago
Elements by far :)
I'm not geting upset now....I promise :)
Oh Blackberry rates a mention as well. The only other one that is so silly that you will all laugh at is called Filenet.
The Filenet Manager which is the CORE of the app refuses to start up unless it has FULL CONTROL of........wait for it.
HKCR!!!!!!!!!!!!! The whole key.
I swear to god :)
I'm not geting upset now....I promise :)
Oh Blackberry rates a mention as well. The only other one that is so silly that you will all laugh at is called Filenet.
The Filenet Manager which is the CORE of the app refuses to start up unless it has FULL CONTROL of........wait for it.
HKCR!!!!!!!!!!!!! The whole key.
I swear to god :)
Posted by:
cdupuis
20 years ago
Posted by:
ab2cv
20 years ago
Roxio Easy CD 5 and 6 both get my vote. Even if you manage to find a way to pass the license keys to the msi for an unattended install, you'll still be lucky to get the program to register properly. Oh, and you'll need to make sure you log on as an administrator the first time you launch it or else it wont work at all!
Other contenders - any of the ArcGIS suite, which insist on updating your vb before installing and also insist on rebooting after installing or uninstalling (even a REBOOT=R doesn't work!).
Visio also gets half a vote just because it comes with about 50 odd individual msi files.
Thankfully (it would seem) i've never had the 'pleasure' of packaging the adobe 6 range.
Other contenders - any of the ArcGIS suite, which insist on updating your vb before installing and also insist on rebooting after installing or uninstalling (even a REBOOT=R doesn't work!).
Visio also gets half a vote just because it comes with about 50 odd individual msi files.
Thankfully (it would seem) i've never had the 'pleasure' of packaging the adobe 6 range.
Posted by:
craig16229
20 years ago
Although there may be other apps out there that are worse and technically more maddening (like, perhaps, MSImakers's run in with Adobe Elements), my vote goes to Acrobat.
Here is my reasoning:
Adobe touts its Acrobat "portable" document format and products on its website as follows:
"Whether you need to share files across the office or around the world, the Adobe® Acrobat® product family enables businesses to simplify document processes using Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). A standard adopted by governments and enterprises worldwide, Adobe PDF is a reliable format for electronic document exchange that preserves document integrity so files can be viewed and printed on a variety of platforms."
You would think with Acrobat's success and the omnipresence of .pdf documents, and the fact that computer's are on nearly every worker's desk now, Adobe would make it truly "enterprise deployment friendly".
It's tough, but I am fa.. fa.. fa.. f o r c i n g myself not to go on a rrrrrr... rrrrr... r a n t.
Craig --<>.
Here is my reasoning:
Adobe touts its Acrobat "portable" document format and products on its website as follows:
"
You would think with Acrobat's success and the omnipresence of .pdf documents, and the fact that computer's are on nearly every worker's desk now, Adobe would make it truly "enterprise deployment friendly".
It's tough, but I am fa.. fa.. fa.. f o r c i n g myself not to go on a rrrrrr... rrrrr... r a n t.
Craig --<>.
Posted by:
cdupuis
20 years ago
Posted by:
craig16229
20 years ago
Posted by:
cdupuis
20 years ago
Posted by:
craig16229
20 years ago
cdupuis,
:-) I took that joke about the Adobe marketing team out - sometimes the things that seem funny in our own heads lose humor across the wire. I hope no offense was taken on your part.
Would you not agree, though, that it is easier to get around the HKCU & registration stuff with WinZip than deal with a poorly formed Adobe provided .msi?
Craig --<>.
:-) I took that joke about the Adobe marketing team out - sometimes the things that seem funny in our own heads lose humor across the wire. I hope no offense was taken on your part.
Would you not agree, though, that it is easier to get around the HKCU & registration stuff with WinZip than deal with a poorly formed Adobe provided .msi?
Craig --<>.
Posted by:
cdupuis
20 years ago
I have a great sense of humor, so no offence taken at all. In regards to adobe msi packages...well, I have had no problems and as of yet, maybe it is good that I do not use the products (except Adobe reader which was easy since adobe themsleves provided a robust solution and even OEM version of Installshield tuner).
Posted by:
craig16229
20 years ago
Posted by:
cdupuis
20 years ago
Posted by:
VikingLoki
20 years ago
Posted by:
dsmith29
20 years ago
I have no love for Adobe, but at least they've finally decided to notice that Windows Installer exists! And once you unbury the MSI for Reader 6, it's usable -- not encrusted with proprietary InstallShield stuff.
But my vote here goes to Palm Desktop. If these people have pretensions to be an enterprise solution, they need to make their tools enterprise-deployable. Per user? Puleez, it's not 1996 any more.
Fun forum. Thanks!
But my vote here goes to Palm Desktop. If these people have pretensions to be an enterprise solution, they need to make their tools enterprise-deployable. Per user? Puleez, it's not 1996 any more.
Fun forum. Thanks!
Posted by:
craig16229
20 years ago
Hey, this is nothing. After informing a vendor that we prefer .MSI installs, I actually had a vendor create a single file .exe install and RENAME to an .MSI extension for us. Gee, thanks.
It's a shame that I am forced to work with these people.
VikingLoki,
Actually, this works provided that you sprinkle pixie dust on your monitor, tap your keyboard with your magic wand, and say "abra-ca-dabra, ala-kazam".
[:D]
Craig --<>.
Posted by:
cdupuis
20 years ago
Posted by:
craig16229
20 years ago
Posted by:
Totti
20 years ago
Posted by:
antbark
20 years ago
Rating comments in this legacy AppDeploy message board thread won't reorder them,
so that the conversation will remain readable.
so that the conversation will remain readable.