Borland database enging
what is the best way to handle bde´s.
We have a lot of apps that needs bde or bde settings in the registry.
lets say:
the first app (geonoise) needs only the bde local.
the second app needs only a registry setting..different to the first app
the third app needs also a bde local...
i know that you can merge some settings in one idapi.cfg but i was wondering how you guys of girls handle this.
any help is appreciated
We have a lot of apps that needs bde or bde settings in the registry.
lets say:
the first app (geonoise) needs only the bde local.
the second app needs only a registry setting..different to the first app
the third app needs also a bde local...
i know that you can merge some settings in one idapi.cfg but i was wondering how you guys of girls handle this.
any help is appreciated
0 Comments
[ + ] Show comments
Answers (10)
Please log in to answer
Posted by:
plangton
19 years ago
Hi Sejacru,
I've worked at a palce that had a LOT of Borland BDE applications (maybe around 30 or so), we ended up creating one master idapi.cfg file (which isn't INI file compatible, its a binary file sadly), and deploying that seperately to the packages themselves. It was something of a pain in the neck though, as I think earlier versions of the borland engine weren't compatible with newer versions (from memory, I seem to recall striking some sort of problem like that).
Rgds
Paul
I've worked at a palce that had a LOT of Borland BDE applications (maybe around 30 or so), we ended up creating one master idapi.cfg file (which isn't INI file compatible, its a binary file sadly), and deploying that seperately to the packages themselves. It was something of a pain in the neck though, as I think earlier versions of the borland engine weren't compatible with newer versions (from memory, I seem to recall striking some sort of problem like that).
Rgds
Paul
Posted by:
goosey1
19 years ago
Posted by:
sejacru
19 years ago
Posted by:
sejacru
19 years ago
Posted by:
goosey1
19 years ago
I see no problems with that solution, it's just a matter of maintenance.
Everytime a new BDE database is introduced into the environment, you have to re-deploy idap32.cfg.
Everytime you capture an program that installs the BDE, you have to exclude it, and make sure it doesn't break your existing install.
I, personally, found the merge modules easier because we have a handful of people who use BDE and I didn't want to have to remember what I did last time, the next time it came up [:D]
Flip a coin [;)]
Everytime a new BDE database is introduced into the environment, you have to re-deploy idap32.cfg.
Everytime you capture an program that installs the BDE, you have to exclude it, and make sure it doesn't break your existing install.
I, personally, found the merge modules easier because we have a handful of people who use BDE and I didn't want to have to remember what I did last time, the next time it came up [:D]
Flip a coin [;)]
Posted by:
plangton
19 years ago
Posted by:
sejacru
19 years ago
Posted by:
goosey1
19 years ago
sejacru, i can't remember the details i'm afraid, it's been a while since i dealt with the bornald mm's.
however, i seem to remember the borland support site was pretty decent and the mm's came with some form of doco.
I'll have a hunt around for the last app i did that used borland and let you know if i find it!
however, i seem to remember the borland support site was pretty decent and the mm's came with some form of doco.
I'll have a hunt around for the last app i did that used borland and let you know if i find it!
Rating comments in this legacy AppDeploy message board thread won't reorder them,
so that the conversation will remain readable.
so that the conversation will remain readable.