Creating Packages - XP or Corporate Platform?
Hi all - I wanna discuss how you all are working when capturing applications.
Are you using a Clean system?, or are you using the Corporate Platform?
My personal choise is to use the Corporate Platform (if existing).
The reason for this is that in this case you dont get all "systemcomponents" in the package, ie (MDAC, CrystalReports, DAO, and so on).
Any comments?
/fetgor
Are you using a Clean system?, or are you using the Corporate Platform?
My personal choise is to use the Corporate Platform (if existing).
The reason for this is that in this case you dont get all "systemcomponents" in the package, ie (MDAC, CrystalReports, DAO, and so on).
Any comments?
/fetgor
0 Comments
[ + ] Show comments
Answers (4)
Please log in to answer
Posted by:
jonasm
18 years ago
Posted by:
revizor
18 years ago
As clean as possible, preferably a down-level OS (Win2K vs XP or 2K3).
The system components are either stripped out or replaced by merge modules.
This way, we don't care whether the Corporate Image has been used, or if a system is an ad-hoc build (like administrator's station that doesn't have the bulk of the Production applications).
Besides, the standard build normally undergoes several revisions every year (legacy apps or components may be stripped out). I'd rather not update 200 applications following standard build revision...
The system components are either stripped out or replaced by merge modules.
This way, we don't care whether the Corporate Image has been used, or if a system is an ad-hoc build (like administrator's station that doesn't have the bulk of the Production applications).
Besides, the standard build normally undergoes several revisions every year (legacy apps or components may be stripped out). I'd rather not update 200 applications following standard build revision...
Posted by:
WayneB
18 years ago
Posted by:
Satin
18 years ago
Rating comments in this legacy AppDeploy message board thread won't reorder them,
so that the conversation will remain readable.
so that the conversation will remain readable.