How do you name your apps? Underscores or no Underscore..
Application_Name_Version_PackageVersion.MSI
or
Application Name Version PackageVersion.MSI
eg
Acrobat_Reader_5.0.5_P1.0.MSI
Acrobat Reader 5.0.5 P1.0.MSI
or
Application Name Version PackageVersion.MSI
eg
Acrobat_Reader_5.0.5_P1.0.MSI
Acrobat Reader 5.0.5 P1.0.MSI
0 Comments
[ + ] Show comments
Answers (11)
Please log in to answer
Posted by:
emuringer
18 years ago
Posted by:
ictu packager
18 years ago
Posted by:
shogun_ro
18 years ago
Usually you should use underscores instead of spaces.It's "safer" this way.
The name convention should be the one that best suites your needs.
Depending on the project we use:
[APP_NAME]-[App_Version]-[Language]-[PackageVersion].msi
or
[AppNumber]-[APP_NAME]-[App_Version]-[Language]-[PackageVersion].msi
or some other naming convention the client wants.
The name convention should be the one that best suites your needs.
Depending on the project we use:
[APP_NAME]-[App_Version]-[Language]-[PackageVersion].msi
or
[AppNumber]-[APP_NAME]-[App_Version]-[Language]-[PackageVersion].msi
or some other naming convention the client wants.
Posted by:
MSIPackager
18 years ago
Yep I'd recommend losing the spaces.. whether you replace them with _'s is up to you - personally I just lose the spaces and have _'s between app name, version and package revision - this helps with scripting and automation later as you know the format is always the same - only 2 _'s
Also I never have the manufacturer in the file name.
E.G.
AcrobatReader_6.0.3_a.msi or
Project_2002.SP1_a.msi
Cheers,
Rob.
Also I never have the manufacturer in the file name.
E.G.
AcrobatReader_6.0.3_a.msi or
Project_2002.SP1_a.msi
Cheers,
Rob.
Posted by:
oreillyr
18 years ago
Posted by:
renio
18 years ago
We're also struggeling with the naming convention of our packages. I believe it's important to have the actual application name and the application version in the name + some kind of package version.
Suppose you created a package version 1.0 for application WinZip 8.0. The package seems to be OK, it is already in production environment, but afterwards a minor modification has to be made (configuration change) for that application. You create package version 1.1 for example which, for example, installs WinZip 9.0 including the new config (or no install of WinZip and just apply the new config). You could also have package version 2.0 which installs WinZip 9.
Could a package name like WinZip 1.0 for application WinZip 9.0 be advisable?
Or package name WinZip 9.0 for application WinZip 9.0 ... and afterwards (for fixes) WinZip 9.0 FIX1.0 or something... I don't know... please some advice tnx :)
Suppose you created a package version 1.0 for application WinZip 8.0. The package seems to be OK, it is already in production environment, but afterwards a minor modification has to be made (configuration change) for that application. You create package version 1.1 for example which, for example, installs WinZip 9.0 including the new config (or no install of WinZip and just apply the new config). You could also have package version 2.0 which installs WinZip 9.
Could a package name like WinZip 1.0 for application WinZip 9.0 be advisable?
Or package name WinZip 9.0 for application WinZip 9.0 ... and afterwards (for fixes) WinZip 9.0 FIX1.0 or something... I don't know... please some advice tnx :)
Posted by:
Jim101
18 years ago
Hi Yeah we have our naming convention sorted and use spaces as we have Altiris CMS as the preferred delivery solution; just keen to find out what others use;
renio - this may be off some assistance in helping you, but I have to say I agree with Rob in not including Manufacture name;
Application_Name
Version
PackageVersion
eg
Acrobat_Reader_5.0.5_P1.0.MSI
although as I said at my current client we use
Acrobat Reader 5.0.5 P1.0.MSI
Hope this helps.
Regards
renio - this may be off some assistance in helping you, but I have to say I agree with Rob in not including Manufacture name;
Application_Name
Version
PackageVersion
eg
Acrobat_Reader_5.0.5_P1.0.MSI
although as I said at my current client we use
Acrobat Reader 5.0.5 P1.0.MSI
Hope this helps.
Regards
Posted by:
mgroover
18 years ago
As far ias i know you should discuss it with your deployment people.
If they are using SMS you cannot have underscores or spaces.
Not entirely true, you can still have spaces and stuff as long as they are enclosed with quotation marks..
We use SMS and use a standardized VB-wrapper script with an XML-config file for deploying our applications.
Posted by:
yarborg
18 years ago
Ours are a little bit different since we have several groups that package applications.
BusinessGroup_CommonName_Version_WindowsVersion.exe
So it might look like this for WinZip:
RET_WinZip_9.0b_XP.exe or even RET_WinZip_9.0b_ALL.exe.
This helps determine quickly who the package was intended for and what versions of Windows it's compatible with. The RET is some acronym that we would assign to a particular group.
BusinessGroup_CommonName_Version_WindowsVersion.exe
So it might look like this for WinZip:
RET_WinZip_9.0b_XP.exe or even RET_WinZip_9.0b_ALL.exe.
This helps determine quickly who the package was intended for and what versions of Windows it's compatible with. The RET is some acronym that we would assign to a particular group.
Posted by:
Thegunner
18 years ago
Posted by:
Robb Thomas
18 years ago
ORIGINAL: mgroover
We use SMS and use a standardized VB-wrapper script with an XML-config file for deploying our applications.
What is the purpose of using a VB-wrapper script?
SMS when it is directly exposed to the MSI file, it will automatically fix autoheal points for the various software packages. By putting a wrapper around your MSI file, would SMS still be able to repair autoheal points for the VB wrapped package correctly?
Regards,
----- Robb ----
Rating comments in this legacy AppDeploy message board thread won't reorder them,
so that the conversation will remain readable.
so that the conversation will remain readable.