k1000 v5.3 L10n server worth the upgrade
Hi
I'm still on 5.2 server with kbox agent 5.1 and I'm wondering if 5.3 l10n is worth the upgrade, has anyone encountered any major issues? I'm thinking of upgrading the server first and then slowly rolling out the 5.3 clients after a few weeks of testing.
Let me know what your experience has been?
Thanks in advance,
Mike
I'm still on 5.2 server with kbox agent 5.1 and I'm wondering if 5.3 l10n is worth the upgrade, has anyone encountered any major issues? I'm thinking of upgrading the server first and then slowly rolling out the 5.3 clients after a few weeks of testing.
Let me know what your experience has been?
Thanks in advance,
Mike
0 Comments
[ + ] Show comments
Answers (12)
Please log in to answer
Posted by:
RichB
12 years ago
Posted by:
airwolf
12 years ago
Posted by:
ms01ak
12 years ago
Posted by:
darkhawktman
12 years ago
Posted by:
airwolf
12 years ago
We have 80 remote sites and have not had any throttling issues. I believe that is one of the major bug fixes in 5.3 SP1 (check the release notes).
ms01ak - the 5.1 agent should be left on clients when you upgrade the server to 5.3. The old agents will work with the new server but not vice-versa. You want to be on 5.3 SP1 on the server before upgrading any agents.
ms01ak - the 5.1 agent should be left on clients when you upgrade the server to 5.3. The old agents will work with the new server but not vice-versa. You want to be on 5.3 SP1 on the server before upgrading any agents.
Posted by:
darkhawktman
12 years ago
Posted by:
airwolf
12 years ago
Posted by:
diverdaveman1
12 years ago
In my opinion, I think it comes down to what modules you're using. We mostly use it for Inventory and Distribution of 3rd party software. We don't use Patching or the Help Desk so I can't tell you if anything is broke in those modules. There are still some bugs with the latest versions. Unfortunately, testing will show you if it's worth the ride or not.
We moved to the 5.3 server last year and kept our 5.1 clients after deciding there were too many bugs with the 5.3 client. Read some of the posts on 5.3 to get a better feel.
Dave
We moved to the 5.3 server last year and kept our 5.1 clients after deciding there were too many bugs with the 5.3 client. Read some of the posts on 5.3 to get a better feel.
Dave
Posted by:
nshah
12 years ago
Posted by:
Harold.Moore
12 years ago
Posted by:
cblake
12 years ago
Note that "L10N" moniker on any of our products means that it supports multiple languages abroad; the latest release numbers though are quite solid.
Call me biased if you will, but there's some awesome stuff in 5.3 including an agent that has no .Net dependancy, new reporting tools, helpdesk enhancements, and more. I think it's worth it, but I use every part of my appliance- as mentioned above it's largely going to be related to what you care about. Check the release notes and see what's new that might benefit you. Some things had issues in the initial release of 5.3, but with the AP1 maintenance release a lot of that was resolved.
As a side note- as of the next major release the configuration you mentioned will become unsupported; Kace only supports the current release and one previous.
Call me biased if you will, but there's some awesome stuff in 5.3 including an agent that has no .Net dependancy, new reporting tools, helpdesk enhancements, and more. I think it's worth it, but I use every part of my appliance- as mentioned above it's largely going to be related to what you care about. Check the release notes and see what's new that might benefit you. Some things had issues in the initial release of 5.3, but with the AP1 maintenance release a lot of that was resolved.
As a side note- as of the next major release the configuration you mentioned will become unsupported; Kace only supports the current release and one previous.
Posted by:
dchristian
12 years ago
Rating comments in this legacy AppDeploy message board thread won't reorder them,
so that the conversation will remain readable.
so that the conversation will remain readable.