several problems with de k2100
Hello,
we own a k2100 unit for a week now.
but we have some problems
1. the driver feed is not working, when i push the install button it gives the following error:
-Error: Unexpected status code when downloading package (403 ).
What can i do to fix this?
2. the network speed when deploying an image is low.
- a deployment goes at about ~80Mbps per node, is it possible to speed this up? (deploying 1 machine can be way faster).
we own a k2100 unit for a week now.
but we have some problems
1. the driver feed is not working, when i push the install button it gives the following error:
-Error: Unexpected status code when downloading package (403 ).
What can i do to fix this?
2. the network speed when deploying an image is low.
- a deployment goes at about ~80Mbps per node, is it possible to speed this up? (deploying 1 machine can be way faster).
0 Comments
[ + ] Show comments
Answers (10)
Please log in to answer
Posted by:
airwolf
13 years ago
It sounds like you have firewall or IPS issues preventing proper communication to/from your K2100.
On a side note, you should probably avoid the driver feed anyway - all of the Dell models import a driver that causes an error during XP install. They are working on fixing this, but the driver feed is useless (for XP anyway) at this point.
On a side note, you should probably avoid the driver feed anyway - all of the Dell models import a driver that causes an error during XP install. They are working on fixing this, but the driver feed is useless (for XP anyway) at this point.
Posted by:
petrybosch
13 years ago
Posted by:
airwolf
13 years ago
Posted by:
dchristian
13 years ago
Posted by:
airwolf
13 years ago
Driver harvesting works well, but it misses a few things from time to time. I've only had to resort to using post-install tasks for drivers for Intel chipset drivers - they are a pain and won't install themselves during Windows setup.
I agree the feed is an excellent idea - they just need to rip those RICOH media drivers out of there so Windows XP stops bombing out.
I agree the feed is an excellent idea - they just need to rip those RICOH media drivers out of there so Windows XP stops bombing out.
Posted by:
dyehardfan
13 years ago
You would think that these sorts of things would be tested before they were released unto the wild. I am doing my first Win7 install with the driver feed tomorrow and hoping for better results than we had with XP.
ORIGINAL: airwolf
Driver harvesting works well, but it misses a few things from time to time. I've only had to resort to using post-install tasks for drivers for Intel chipset drivers - they are a pain and won't install themselves during Windows setup.
I agree the feed is an excellent idea - they just need to rip those RICOH media drivers out of there so Windows XP stops bombing out.
Posted by:
cblake
13 years ago
FYI- My biggest pain point has been mass storage drivers creating OS install conflicts. It's a great delivery mechinism for specific models, but personally I use the feed to download, then disable it and remove the drivers that cause conflicts. In reality the problem has always existed, we used to call it overharvesting- when folks uploaded every driver from every system and created the issue. Our recommendation is and always has been to upload to the driver repository only the specific drivers that you need; or use post install tasks to deliver your drivers as "driver packs". Driver packs are potentially much more efficient and less problematic because they're being delivered how the driver manufacturer intended (rather than how microsoft will allow it). Driver feeds were created due to demand- though we are working with the providers on cleaning out the known problem drivers. Please send your feedback to support as you encounter those issues though.
Posted by:
petrybosch
13 years ago
Posted by:
petrybosch
13 years ago
as i mentioned before i noticed not all of my machines are listed in the driver feed, are there any plans of adding more models to it?
i also checked some settings because of the error i have here:
ISP: not a problem
Proxy: not a problem (added the url's to the whitelist just to make sure)
FW: not a problem as port 80 and port 21 traffic will always pass thru.
does somebody have a great idea what the problem could be?
i also checked some settings because of the error i have here:
ISP: not a problem
Proxy: not a problem (added the url's to the whitelist just to make sure)
FW: not a problem as port 80 and port 21 traffic will always pass thru.
does somebody have a great idea what the problem could be?
Posted by:
dyehardfan
13 years ago
You would probably get a quicker solution by calling support on this.
ORIGINAL: petrybosch
as i mentioned before i noticed not all of my machines are listed in the driver feed, are there any plans of adding more models to it?
i also checked some settings because of the error i have here:
ISP: not a problem
Proxy: not a problem (added the url's to the whitelist just to make sure)
FW: not a problem as port 80 and port 21 traffic will always pass thru.
does somebody have a great idea what the problem could be?
Rating comments in this legacy AppDeploy message board thread won't reorder them,
so that the conversation will remain readable.
so that the conversation will remain readable.