Unacceptable Slow Patching By K1000
Good Day Everyone,
I am very disappointed in the K1000 in terms of patching. It is taking in inordinate amount of time to patch nodes. I was instructed to upgrade the agent to version 5.5.30275 which i did as a test server. The single server is running Windows Server 2008. Here is the beginning and completion time which shows a start time of 10pm to completion at 1am in the morning.
Scheduled Task Status | |||||||
Schedule | Schedule Last Run | Machine Status Date | Current Phase | ||||
2440 Test Machines | 05/17/2014 19:44:06 | 05/18/2014 01:24:40 | completed | ||||
2440 LAN Servers | 05/16/2014 00:47:35 | 05/16/2014 00:55:29 | completed |
Can someone assist? Would setting up a replication share - separate from K1000 - improve performance? The replication share would run in the same network and simply be used to offload.
Thanks
Steve
4 Comments
[ + ] Show comments
Answers (0)
Please log in to answer
Be the first to answer this question
1. Detect patches
2. Deploy patches
3. Verify patches
4. Reboot if necessary
So if there are multiple reboots involved it will run through this entire cycle each time. KACE also seems to run the detect for every patch included in the patching schedule so it will detect for a much greater number of patches than might be needed by the machine. - chucksteel 10 years ago
However there are number of sweeping issues with K1000.
1) the server took an inordinate amount of time to install a single patch to group of XP boxes. That patch was IE exploit patch.
2) on clients within another domain (my company has two Windows domains) - the Kace agent service was stopped on reboot. Had to manually start up
In my opinion - the K1000 is a really bad piece of software. - shandy4473 10 years ago
I would do a detect only with the same labels, and see the time difference. There's a few other things that could be playing a part. What is your check-in time and machine count? We have multiple domains as well with two Kace servers. Once is still on 5.5, and the other I've just updated to 6.0. I haven't had any problems patching.
I also agree with Timi that if a patch is not downloaded the machine will just stay in a "downloading" phase, and will bump up your time. - dugullett 10 years ago