Dell Kace Question
Hi all,
Could anyone give me pointers on what the diffrance is between the Kace systems and what they do. I have been asked to look into this system after getting an email from Dell about the K1000 and K2000 but have never heard of this before.
Many Thanks
Could anyone give me pointers on what the diffrance is between the Kace systems and what they do. I have been asked to look into this system after getting an email from Dell about the K1000 and K2000 but have never heard of this before.
Many Thanks
0 Comments
[ + ] Show comments
Answers (13)
Please log in to answer
Posted by:
airwolf
14 years ago
The K1000 is a systems management device - used for client hardware/software inventory, software deployment, patch management, help desk, and more. The K2000 is a systems deployment device - used primarily for deploying operating systems to client systems.
Take a look at www.kace.com for more info on each device. 30-day trial virtual machines are available for both systems.
Take a look at www.kace.com for more info on each device. 30-day trial virtual machines are available for both systems.
Posted by:
chrisb1357
14 years ago
Posted by:
airwolf
14 years ago
Posted by:
chrisb1357
14 years ago
Posted by:
airwolf
14 years ago
Not that I know of. We chose the KBOX solution because of the functionality and cost. It is WAY cheaper than alternatives such as SCCM.
There also isn't really anything else on the market like it. I don't know of any other system that integrates so many different management components into a single solution. It improves efficiency for support by integrating the help desk directly with the asset and inventory management systems.
There also isn't really anything else on the market like it. I don't know of any other system that integrates so many different management components into a single solution. It improves efficiency for support by integrating the help desk directly with the asset and inventory management systems.
Posted by:
crawl
14 years ago
Posted by:
airwolf
14 years ago
Posted by:
airwolf
14 years ago
Posted by:
crawl
14 years ago
WIM images are at the core of Microsoft supported Windows Vista and Windows 7 imaging. Do I like it? Not necessarily but I've been in this business long enough to know that if you venture too far from the source that you start to lose functionality as well as support if something goes wrong. We currently use Altiris and there is always a lag between OS releases and Altiris's ability to provide a solution. That's why we have been exploring other products. Despite my dislike for the fact the Microsoft's technologies tend to isolate other technologies, I had to embrace WIM imaging so that when Vista and 7 were released, I was ready to go. Basically I use Altiris as a shell to run my imagex scripts and also for software deployment. I know there are a handful of different ways to image but again, I no longer want to wander too far from the source because I've been burned in the past. In reality, this is a decision that each organization has to decide on or should decide on. Our organization decided to use WIM images in the event that if we switch to SCCM due to budgetary issues, it would help lessen the impact.
As for software deployment, I would never add an application to my base image. Application installs and uninstalls (msi files) are handled separately through Altiris or Group Policy. It's just so much easier and safer to leave images clean and not push down a whole new image.
As for software deployment, I would never add an application to my base image. Application installs and uninstalls (msi files) are handled separately through Altiris or Group Policy. It's just so much easier and safer to leave images clean and not push down a whole new image.
Posted by:
airwolf
14 years ago
In reality, this is a decision that each organization has to decide on or should decide on.
You are correct - the best choice is totally dependent upon the needs of each organization. I can see the need for WIM images in some cases, but timeliness in deployment of new operating systems is typically not a priority in the business world. Businesses are typically the latest adopters, because moving to new operating systems and software before the kinks are worked out after initial release is a bit risky. Historically, most businesses adopt new operating systems and office suites after the first service pack is released - which is plenty of time for support to be added in third-party patching and deployment solutions.
Posted by:
crawl
14 years ago
Posted by:
teddyfer
14 years ago
hi, my company looking for desktop management, in may hand already KACE brosur and ManageEngine Desktop Central software trial version of desktop central,
Does any one know the different......?, for a while i just look only different GUI all feature most likely same......
so what benefit from KACE....?
thanks
Does any one know the different......?, for a while i just look only different GUI all feature most likely same......
so what benefit from KACE....?
thanks
Rating comments in this legacy AppDeploy message board thread won't reorder them,
so that the conversation will remain readable.
so that the conversation will remain readable.